Case studies · social proof
Evidence before logos.
Institutional customer names and outcome metrics appear only with sealed public artifacts or explicit written permission. Until design partner results are publishable under those rules, this page carries methodology cases grounded in public capsules — not borrowed logos.
For institutional evaluators
What a case study must prove
Buyers evaluating deterministic governance need a reconstructible path: problem → method → sealed evidence → explicit boundary.
Problem
A decision path that cannot be reconstructed or bounded creates liability.
Method
Freeze capsules, independent verifiers, written success criteria.
Boundary
Capsule-scoped claims only. Unproven metrics stay UNAVAILABLE.
CS-001 · methodology
PUBLIC CAPSULES · VERIFIEDSealed replay & illegal-transition rejection
A worked example of how EVO-V evidence is expected to look when a high-stakes decision path must remain reconstructible and bounded.
01 · Problem
Systems change state in ways operators cannot reconstruct: which rule applied, whether an illegal transition was attempted, whether the audit trail still matches live memory.
02 · Approach
Freeze public capsules for deterministic replay parity and illegal lifecycle rejection. Independent Node and Python verifiers must exit 0 on sealed hashes.
03 · Evidence
ART-L7-REPLAY-001, ART-L7-REJECT-001, ART-L7-PARITY-001 — all VERIFIED on the public Proof Registry.
04 · Boundary
Capsule-scoped only. Performance numbers remain UNAVAILABLE until sealed benchmark artifacts exist.
Institutional cases
UNAVAILABLE · no published named institutional case studies
Design partner pilots are open. Named cases appear only after written permission and evidence review.
Pilot first. Publish later.
Methodology cases show the evidence standard. Named outcomes require permission and sealed artifacts.